<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="de">
	<id>https://lebenskunst.berlin/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=DraftKings_CEO_Criticizes_Gambling_Provision_In_Trump%27s_OBBBA</id>
	<title>DraftKings CEO Criticizes Gambling Provision In Trump&#039;s OBBBA - Versionsgeschichte</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://lebenskunst.berlin/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=DraftKings_CEO_Criticizes_Gambling_Provision_In_Trump%27s_OBBBA"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lebenskunst.berlin/index.php?title=DraftKings_CEO_Criticizes_Gambling_Provision_In_Trump%27s_OBBBA&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-08T13:20:17Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Versionsgeschichte dieser Seite in lebenskunst.berlin</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lebenskunst.berlin/index.php?title=DraftKings_CEO_Criticizes_Gambling_Provision_In_Trump%27s_OBBBA&amp;diff=9893&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>VirgilioBianco9: Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „&lt;br&gt;DraftKings CEO Jason Robins slammed a [https://gratisafhalen.be/author/gonzalo45e5/ brand-new tax] provision in President Donald Trump&#039;s proposed megabill, [http://wikiphilosophy.org/index.php/User:AXVJoseph78188 calling] it &quot;very weird&quot; and illogical. Robins questioned why gamblers should pay income tax on cash that isn&#039;t [https://www.adpost4u.com/user/profile/4307926 real revenue].&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- [https://lectionary.wiki/w/User:RichBudd3999469 DraftKi…“</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lebenskunst.berlin/index.php?title=DraftKings_CEO_Criticizes_Gambling_Provision_In_Trump%27s_OBBBA&amp;diff=9893&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-04-08T05:06:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;DraftKings CEO Jason Robins slammed a [https://gratisafhalen.be/author/gonzalo45e5/ brand-new tax] provision in President Donald Trump&amp;#039;s proposed megabill, [http://wikiphilosophy.org/index.php/User:AXVJoseph78188 calling] it &amp;quot;very weird&amp;quot; and illogical. Robins questioned why gamblers should pay income tax on cash that isn&amp;#039;t [https://www.adpost4u.com/user/profile/4307926 real revenue].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;- [https://lectionary.wiki/w/User:RichBudd3999469 DraftKi…“&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Neue Seite&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;DraftKings CEO Jason Robins slammed a [https://gratisafhalen.be/author/gonzalo45e5/ brand-new tax] provision in President Donald Trump&amp;#039;s proposed megabill, [http://wikiphilosophy.org/index.php/User:AXVJoseph78188 calling] it &amp;quot;very weird&amp;quot; and illogical. Robins questioned why gamblers should pay income tax on cash that isn&amp;#039;t [https://www.adpost4u.com/user/profile/4307926 real revenue].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;- [https://lectionary.wiki/w/User:RichBudd3999469 DraftKings CEO] says  does not make good sense.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;- The OBBBA avoids bettors from subtracting 100% of their losses.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;- DraftKings states it&amp;#039;s dealing with lawmakers to nix the arrangement.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;I do think it&amp;#039;s something that does not makes good sense,&amp;quot; [https://wiki.chimericalintelligence.org/index.php/User:MattRosenthal7 Robins informed] CNBC&amp;#039;s Jim Cramer. &amp;quot;If you can&amp;#039;t subtract all your losses, you know, how does that make good sense that you pay income tax on something that&amp;#039;s not in fact earnings.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The arrangement, highlighted in the GOP&amp;#039;s One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), would avoid gamblers from subtracting 100% of their losses from their payouts, which was previously thought about standard practice. Under the new rule, only 90% of losses can be subtracted, implying that even a break-even bettor still owes taxes.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Robins attributed the modification to a [http://wiki.die-karte-bitte.de/index.php/Benutzer_Diskussion:DorisBillings9 budget plan] reconciliation technicality referred to as the [https://gummipuppen-wiki.de/index.php?title=Benutzer:MaribelIsrael Byrd guideline] and included that DraftKings is working with [https://gummipuppen-wiki.de/index.php?title=Benutzer:TereseLance990 lawmakers] to reverse the provision.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Congress introduces FAIR BET Act to fight Trump costs&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[https://www.garagesale.es/author/kandicegowr/ DraftKings] isn&amp;#039;t alone in opposing Trump&amp;#039;s megabill. Nevada Congresswoman Dina Titus has presented the [http://topsite.otaku-attitude.net/index.php?a=stats&amp;amp;u=celsahannan439 FAIR BET] Act to counter the questionable change in [https://corps.humaniste.info/Utilisateur:ErmelindaBurbach betting tax] policy.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The [http://ossenberg.ch/index.php/Benutzer:VernellPassmore brand-new rule] sparked a backlash from [https://www.shbv.info/shbv_wiki/index.php?title=Benutzer_Diskussion:MargieChildress industry professionals] who argue the [https://hiddenwiki.co/index.php?title=User:RemonaWetter502 OBBBA unfairly] burdens taxpayers and dissuades [https://www.ebersbach.org/index.php?title=User:ChristyWaterhous transparent reporting]. The FAIR BET Act, co-sponsored by Rep. Ro Khanna of California, seeks to restore the previous guideline, which allows 100% of betting losses to be subtracted from winnings.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[https://raovatonline.org/author/hassiemulli/ Titus condemned] the wagering tax provision, stating Senate Republicans placed it without House permission and that it might drive [https://gratisafhalen.be/author/daisynunan/ bettors] toward unregulated markets. Titus insists her expense ensures fairness for all wagerers and promotes responsible betting through legal operators.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;DraftKings reports positive Q2 earnings&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;DraftKings, meanwhile, reported its second-ever [https://bioremediate.net/index.php/User:CathrynJacobs31 rewarding] [https://www.adpost4u.com/user/profile/4370044 quarter] as a public business, leading to a 7% jump in stock worth in after-hours trading on Wednesday. The business published $1.51 billion in revenue for Q2 2025, going beyond expert expectations of $1.43 billion.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Robins credited the business&amp;#039;s success to strong client engagement, effective acquisition methods, and favorable wagering [https://kb.smds.us/index.php/User:IvaMetzler6 outcomes]. He [https://gratisafhalen.be/author/veolatildes/ expressed] [http://ossenberg.ch/index.php/Benutzer:BertieAskew0142 optimism] about the continued legalization of sports betting throughout the U.S., [https://www.wiki.somosphm.net/index.php/User:TracieRiddell43 expecting major] markets, such as Texas and California, will be consisted of.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VirgilioBianco9</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>